This is review #283 in my series. Here's the YouTube video:
Post-recording notes: Dark and muted enough to be interesting, but not enough to be blue-black or even dark blue. There's a bit of sheen on the right paper (a wetter nib would surely yield more). Shading may increase on more shade-friendly papers and from the right nib.
Cleaning wasn't bad, but you may need flush or a swab - it was the tiniest bit clingy. The microscope smear was dullsville. I thought I saw a smudge on the 1:45 mark during recording, but examining under greater magnification shows none, so I set the dry time at just over 1:30. In testing, it was over 2 minutes...
Zoomed in photo (Too muted on one monitor, too purple on the other. But not too far off.)
Screenshot (Text is much too dark.)
Scan of Completed Review (This is closest.)
Absorbent Paper Close-up (top is puzzle paper like thick newsprint, bottom is old 20lb copy paper) (Too muted on one monitor, too purple on the other. Reality isn't blotchy.)
Line width (The "I" in "Ink:". Magnification is 100x. The grid is 100x100µm. The scale is 330µm, with eleven divisions of 30µm each. The line width for this ink is roughly 296µm. With 283 inks measured, the average line width is 296µm.)
Previous Review: Diamine Bilberry.
Images also available on Instagram: @zilxodarap.
Want to influence the inky sequence? Take the "next ink" poll.
View a list of my inks, complete with review results in a google sheet.
Need to catch up on The Adventures of Quin and Makhabesh? Find the whole story here.
Hope you enjoy. Comments appreciated!
Bookmarks